Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
Here's a newbie question for you: Up until now, my first couple of layers on my ABS parts have been wider than the rest of the wall layers, but I didn't mind that because initially I was having trouble getting good adhesion to the glass plate. I felt/assumed that the wider first layers probably helped compress the plastic and caused greater adhesion. I simply took a hand file or sand paper to the unintended "brim" (is that the right term?) and things worked great. (By the way, I am now using the glue stick with my ABS parts and having great success with adhesion).
But now, I am trying to produce a "lego" type of a part. Naturally printing lego blocks will only work if the stud and the openings are held close to fairly tight tolerances. I see many lego STLs out there so someone must be able to do this, but obviously my "squeezed" or compressed first layers are suddenly NOT going to allow me to accomplish the challenge of keeping thin walls to close tolerances.
If I print the lego block right side up, then the thin walls are too fat at the bottom and the stud will not fit in the cavity produced. If I print the lego block upside down, (which I have not tried yet) then I will have a stud that is too wide to fit into the wall cavity. (Naturally hand filing or sanding round studs or the inside cavity of a small block (to hold closer tolerances) is not going to end with satisfactory results.)
So... a couple of newbie questions:
1) How do I not give up adhesion, but still adjust my Rostack Max V2 (Using Slic3r) to fix my fat first layer problems? (using ABS)
2) If I use thicker paper when calibrating the end stops will that do it? Or will I lose adhesion?
3) How would you layout a lego block (upside down, or right-side up) since there are overhang challenges with both ways?
Can I have both; adhesion and thin wall accuracy?
Thanks ahead of time for your help!
But now, I am trying to produce a "lego" type of a part. Naturally printing lego blocks will only work if the stud and the openings are held close to fairly tight tolerances. I see many lego STLs out there so someone must be able to do this, but obviously my "squeezed" or compressed first layers are suddenly NOT going to allow me to accomplish the challenge of keeping thin walls to close tolerances.
If I print the lego block right side up, then the thin walls are too fat at the bottom and the stud will not fit in the cavity produced. If I print the lego block upside down, (which I have not tried yet) then I will have a stud that is too wide to fit into the wall cavity. (Naturally hand filing or sanding round studs or the inside cavity of a small block (to hold closer tolerances) is not going to end with satisfactory results.)
So... a couple of newbie questions:
1) How do I not give up adhesion, but still adjust my Rostack Max V2 (Using Slic3r) to fix my fat first layer problems? (using ABS)
2) If I use thicker paper when calibrating the end stops will that do it? Or will I lose adhesion?
3) How would you layout a lego block (upside down, or right-side up) since there are overhang challenges with both ways?
Can I have both; adhesion and thin wall accuracy?
Thanks ahead of time for your help!
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
I'll let someone else respond to the adhesion vs. accuracy thing because honestly I have always operated my printer in a similar way to you...fatter first layer for better adhesion. But, the one thing I will add is that I wouldn't try to calibrate the end stops to get the nozzle slightly higher off the bed. Change the EEPROM settings for X,Y, and Z max length by however much you want to move the nozzle off the print bed. Reducing this number reduces the distance the printer will travel off the endstops, which is in turn raising the nozzle at Z0 off the build surface.
Also, just an FYI...most printer paper is ~0.003"-0.004" (0.076mm-0.102mm) and since you squish the paper a bit with the nozzle when setting up the nozzle height, it is likely a little lower than the paper's actual thickness.
Also, just an FYI...most printer paper is ~0.003"-0.004" (0.076mm-0.102mm) and since you squish the paper a bit with the nozzle when setting up the nozzle height, it is likely a little lower than the paper's actual thickness.
Current Machines || Rostock Max (V1) | V3DR ||
Previous Machines || Flashforge Creator Pro ||
Previous Machines || Flashforge Creator Pro ||
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
There was a setting in mc for overextruding the first layer.
You can use cigarette rolling paper which is thinner.
You can use cigarette rolling paper which is thinner.
When on mobile I am brief and may be perceived as an arsl.
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
So is my reasoning off? If the paper I am using during calibration is causing the first layer to be squeezed, I don't want "thinner" paper - that would just lower the nozzle closer to the plate, causing the bead of filament to widen out even more, right? I would think I would want to use thicker paper and keep the nozzle further away by a few thousands, wouldn't I? But even so, I will definitely look into the EEPROM settings for X,Y, and Z max length - seems that would be an easyier way to change the distance from the plate.
As to the lego situation? Any advice?
As to the lego situation? Any advice?
- Jimustanguitar
- ULTIMATE 3D JEDI
- Posts: 2608
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:35 am
- Location: Notre Dame area
- Contact:
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
"Elephants foot" - never would have come up with that terminology on my own! lol But that's exactly what I'm talking about.
Perhaps the tiny chamfer idea on the bottom of the part will be helpful... I'll have to try that. Thanks!
Perhaps the tiny chamfer idea on the bottom of the part will be helpful... I'll have to try that. Thanks!
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
I put a .25mm radius on the bottom edges of parts that will be in contact with the bed. It's worked pretty well so far.
g.
g.
Delta Power!
Defeat the Cartesian Agenda!
http://www.f15sim.com - 80-0007, The only one of its kind.
http://geneb.simpits.org - Technical and Simulator Projects
Defeat the Cartesian Agenda!
http://www.f15sim.com - 80-0007, The only one of its kind.
http://geneb.simpits.org - Technical and Simulator Projects
-
- ULTIMATE 3D JEDI
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:44 pm
- Location: Redmond WA
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
I actually disagree with the elephants foot diagnosis from Ultimachine.
The predominant cause is running the bed too hot for the plastic, you can never entirely eliminate it, but you can get damn close by turning down the bed temperature.
The predominant cause is running the bed too hot for the plastic, you can never entirely eliminate it, but you can get damn close by turning down the bed temperature.
Printer blog http://3dprinterhell.blogspot.com/
- Jimustanguitar
- ULTIMATE 3D JEDI
- Posts: 2608
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:35 am
- Location: Notre Dame area
- Contact:
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
They're both true.Polygonhell wrote:I actually disagree with the elephants foot diagnosis from Ultimachine.
The predominant cause is running the bed too hot for the plastic, you can never entirely eliminate it, but you can get damn close by turning down the bed temperature.
It *can* be caused by squishing your first layer too, though. I learned this when I printed my first gear bearing. All of the gears were stuck together because of that squished first layer, and recalibrating my Z0 height slightly fixed the problem instantly.
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
It never occurred to me that the bed temperature could cause the problem - but I suppose if the first layer or two stays soft (during the duration of the print) because the bed heat is too hot, then the following layers will be constantly pushing down on the bottom layers and creating elephant's foot.
Just out of curiosity, what do you set your bed temperature at when using ABS?
Just out of curiosity, what do you set your bed temperature at when using ABS?
-
- Printmaster!
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:11 pm
- Location: Queensland, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
Have you tried using a few raft layers? This way you'll get the adhesion you want without the elephants foot. Normally I'm adverse to raft since it does require a cleanup but it might be worth a shot in this case.
I loved my Rostock so much I now sell them in Oz 

-
- ULTIMATE 3D JEDI
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:44 pm
- Location: Redmond WA
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
I usually run 80C on the bed for ABS with either hairspray or UHU glue sticks.
Printer blog http://3dprinterhell.blogspot.com/
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
A brim might work as well. I too run 80C on the bed when printing ABS. I use Elmer's Disappearing Purple glue stick and I've never had an adhesion failure. I print ABS on Blue MAX which is an old v1 machine running the .80 firmware. 
g.

g.
Delta Power!
Defeat the Cartesian Agenda!
http://www.f15sim.com - 80-0007, The only one of its kind.
http://geneb.simpits.org - Technical and Simulator Projects
Defeat the Cartesian Agenda!
http://www.f15sim.com - 80-0007, The only one of its kind.
http://geneb.simpits.org - Technical and Simulator Projects
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
Wow... I've been running ABS at 90 - so I will try lowering the temperature! I also use the Elmers disappearing purple glue stick - seems to work well. For my latest product prototypes, I have been using rafts with good results too.
Thanks guys for all your assistance.
Thanks guys for all your assistance.
Re: Adhession verses accuracy on first layers...
It's a balancing act for sure. I've been able to do small parts in ABS with a bed temp as low as 60-70° when the hairspray/UHU (I alternate between them) was holding well.