Can't get level first layer/Convex bed
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:52 pm
I've been having problems printing items that are bigger than 100mm, because I can't get the first layer to go down evenly. Its too thin in some spots, and too thick in other spots.
I believe its mostly due to that the bed is convex, even with the glass clamped to it.
I loosened 3 of the six holding the PCB to the snowflake, which helped a little bit, but I'm not sure how to get the bed nicely flat (to a degree that it isn't noticeable).
To the best of my abilities to check with a digital level finder and a metal square, the towers are perpendicular to the bed. All belts are tight, nothing is loose.
I've run the least squares calibration method manually when I had a Rambo board installed, and I could never get the deviation below 0.200.
I've seen other people post that they have a deviation after running a calibration script that is less than 0.05, with typical values of 0.010 to 0.020 (correct me if I'm wrong).
I've recently installed a Duet and have tried all the calibration routines multiple times (6, 7, 8, and 9 factor) and the deviation is still 0.180 to 0.210.
I've added trigger height corrections to the calibration script as outlined here: https://duet3d.com/wiki/Calibrating_a_d ... bed.g_file
Which didn't really make much of a difference.
I've tried bed mesh compensation after calibration but I still can't get an even first layer.
Machine specs are:
Rostock Max V2 (with longer towers for a homed height of ~670mm)
Modifications include:
Duet Wifi
JohnSL FSR kit
New Ball-cup carriage arms and cheapskates
12V 350W PSU
Yellow Jacket Concepts Quick Change board
Current Config settings:
M665 R143.548 L290.8 B135 H667.946 X0.558 Y0.202 Z0
M666 X-0.40 Y0.75 Z-0.35
Here are some heightmaps, towers indicated on graph:
After S6 Calibration After S7 Calibration After S8 Calibration After S9 Calibration Also attached the data points as an excel document
I've run out of ideas of what to check or change to improve my first layers. I'm kind of thinking that I have to force the bed to be flat with a piece of aluminum, but I'm not sure if I can force the bed flat that way.
I believe its mostly due to that the bed is convex, even with the glass clamped to it.
I loosened 3 of the six holding the PCB to the snowflake, which helped a little bit, but I'm not sure how to get the bed nicely flat (to a degree that it isn't noticeable).
To the best of my abilities to check with a digital level finder and a metal square, the towers are perpendicular to the bed. All belts are tight, nothing is loose.
I've run the least squares calibration method manually when I had a Rambo board installed, and I could never get the deviation below 0.200.
I've seen other people post that they have a deviation after running a calibration script that is less than 0.05, with typical values of 0.010 to 0.020 (correct me if I'm wrong).
I've recently installed a Duet and have tried all the calibration routines multiple times (6, 7, 8, and 9 factor) and the deviation is still 0.180 to 0.210.
I've added trigger height corrections to the calibration script as outlined here: https://duet3d.com/wiki/Calibrating_a_d ... bed.g_file
Which didn't really make much of a difference.
I've tried bed mesh compensation after calibration but I still can't get an even first layer.
Machine specs are:
Rostock Max V2 (with longer towers for a homed height of ~670mm)
Modifications include:
Duet Wifi
JohnSL FSR kit
New Ball-cup carriage arms and cheapskates
12V 350W PSU
Yellow Jacket Concepts Quick Change board
Current Config settings:
M665 R143.548 L290.8 B135 H667.946 X0.558 Y0.202 Z0
M666 X-0.40 Y0.75 Z-0.35
Here are some heightmaps, towers indicated on graph:
After S6 Calibration After S7 Calibration After S8 Calibration After S9 Calibration Also attached the data points as an excel document
I've run out of ideas of what to check or change to improve my first layers. I'm kind of thinking that I have to force the bed to be flat with a piece of aluminum, but I'm not sure if I can force the bed flat that way.