I don't see how bio is any greener than fossil plastics
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 4:40 pm
This is something that is starting to bother me about people recommending filament. How is a bio plastic any more green?
Before you answer that question consider this:
- ABS plastic is a byproduct of fossil fuels and is now considered a primary product. If it is not used then it will either collect as waste or get burned off (the chems that make it).
- PLA is a grown plastic. So it requires energy to produce (probably in excess of what ABS takes, this would need to be checked).
- PLA is a new process compared to ABS so there is less infrastructure and support behind it. (that will change as it progresses I know)
- Recycling old plastic from: toys, shopping bags, pop bottles, etc is more green than new ABS or bio plastics.
- Some fossil based plastics are designed to break down just as readily as a bio plastic.
- We have a fossil fuel economy, that is not going to change fast. So not using ABS from that process is counterproductive.
So, for my situation I am totally stoked about making filament from recycled plastic. A friend of mine found a truck bed liner that was thrown away and has proceeded to cut it up so I can make filament. I am currently collecting every type of plastic I would normally throw away. I personally believe that is the most "green" plastic source I can think of.
Yes, if we were actually moving away from a fossil economy I would say bio plastics were greener. However, recycling is the most green currently. Following that I am not sure if bio based is any greener than fossil just because of the usage issue. If it is not used it will get discarded/burned. Sucks yes, but you cannot drive a 3000lb vehicle to a from work everyday and expect there not to be a cost for that convenience.
BTW, I am eying my dead van and wondering how much plastic I can extrude from that... Plus I am wondering if the parts of the van could be used to make a giant 3d printer...
Before you answer that question consider this:
- ABS plastic is a byproduct of fossil fuels and is now considered a primary product. If it is not used then it will either collect as waste or get burned off (the chems that make it).
- PLA is a grown plastic. So it requires energy to produce (probably in excess of what ABS takes, this would need to be checked).
- PLA is a new process compared to ABS so there is less infrastructure and support behind it. (that will change as it progresses I know)
- Recycling old plastic from: toys, shopping bags, pop bottles, etc is more green than new ABS or bio plastics.
- Some fossil based plastics are designed to break down just as readily as a bio plastic.
- We have a fossil fuel economy, that is not going to change fast. So not using ABS from that process is counterproductive.
So, for my situation I am totally stoked about making filament from recycled plastic. A friend of mine found a truck bed liner that was thrown away and has proceeded to cut it up so I can make filament. I am currently collecting every type of plastic I would normally throw away. I personally believe that is the most "green" plastic source I can think of.
Yes, if we were actually moving away from a fossil economy I would say bio plastics were greener. However, recycling is the most green currently. Following that I am not sure if bio based is any greener than fossil just because of the usage issue. If it is not used it will get discarded/burned. Sucks yes, but you cannot drive a 3000lb vehicle to a from work everyday and expect there not to be a cost for that convenience.
BTW, I am eying my dead van and wondering how much plastic I can extrude from that... Plus I am wondering if the parts of the van could be used to make a giant 3d printer...